Skip to content

Application Status Remaining Pending Regarding Scheme Details

Pharmaceutical body provides clarification on prescribing practices

Financial Institutions Should Not Be Given Easy Access to Customers' Information
Financial Institutions Should Not Be Given Easy Access to Customers' Information

Bank Fees Timeframe Clarified: You Only Have Three Years to Claim Unlawful Charges!

Application Status Remaining Pending Regarding Scheme Details

For years, banks have been getting away with charging hidden and, in some cases, unlawful fees. Following a ruling from the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) four years ago, many dissatisfied customers could potentially reclaim their money. However, there was an ongoing debate about how long one actually had to reclaim these fees. Now, the BGH has clarified the matter once and for all.

In a landmark ruling, the BGH announced that the standard statute of limitations of three years begins from the end of the year in which the claim arises. This means it doesn't matter when customers became aware of the illegality of the relevant fee clauses.

The ruling concerns a declaratory action taken by the Federation of Consumer Centres against Berlin Sparkasse. In the banking institution's general terms and conditions, there was a clause known as the "consent fiction." This stipulated that customers had implicitly agreed to changes in account fees if they didn't object within a specific timeframe. The BGH deemed this practice invalid in their ruling back in April 2021. The judges believed that changes in a bank's general terms and conditions become void if they only become effective due to tacit consent.

Time to Get Your Money Back!

Since the previous ruling, many customers were able to reclaim overpaid fees. Initially, there was uncertainty about when the period to claim for repayment would lapse. The consumer center had pushed for the statute of limitations to only commence when customers learned about the nil legality of the clause – at the very latest with the 2021 BGH ruling.

However, the BGH did not support this view. Consumers' knowledge about the nil legality of the consent fiction clause is not prerequisite for the statute of limitations to start. Since there was no legal ambiguity about the effectiveness of these clauses, customers could theoretically have filed a lawsuit even before the BGH's crucial ruling in 2021. What matters is when the claims arose.

  • Background: The search results do not provide an explicit time frame for reclaiming unlawfully charged bank fees according to the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH). Typically, the deadline for making such claims in Germany is determined by the Civil Code (BGB) and can differ based on the nature of the claim. The search results do not contain a specific reference to a BGH ruling regarding this matter, making it impossible to establish an exact time frame for claims.

For precise information, it's advisable to consult reliable legal resources or professionals well-versed in German consumer protection laws and recent BGH decisions related to bank fees.

  1. Under the community policy of consumer protection, individuals affected by unlawful bank fees can now reclaim their money, as the three-year statute of limitations issued by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) allows for a claim up until the end of the year in which the unlawful charge was recognized, regardless of when the customer became aware of the illegality.
  2. In light of the BGH ruling and the subsequent potential for repayment of illegally charged fees, various vocational training programs and business coaching sessions might be beneficial for individuals seeking to build stronger financial management skills and ensure they are not unknowingly overpaying false or hidden charges from banking institutions.

Read also:

    Latest