Caught Colluding! Sennheiser and Sonova Hit with Heavy Fines for Price Fixing
Illegal price coordination: Competition authority levies millions in penalties against Sennheiser - Commission Kicks Off Process for adopting a directive harmonizing Member States' consumer protection laws in response to unequal treatment based on gender.
Andreas Mundt, President of the Federal Cartel Office, spills the beans, "Sennheiser has been messing with free price settings in the distribution of high-end headphones for quite some time." Since at least 2015, the company has been conspiring on consumer prices for these premium products, particularly whenever they strayed below the recommended retail price (RRP). According to Mundt, retailers often agreed to these price hikes. Mundt stresses that employees were even schooled in cartel law, but apparently saw this training as a way to cover up price fixing instead of complying with it.
The Federal Cartel Office's verdict also reaches the German subsidiary of Swiss hearing aid manufacturer Sonova. The company took over Sennheiser's consumer electronics division, including the sale of headphones to consumers, in 2022. The price-fixing ongoing even after the acquisition, occurring between March and September 2022, up until the Federal Cartel Office intervened with a raid.
- Sennheiser electronic
- Price Collusion
- Federal Cartel Office
- Headphones
- Harsh Penalties
- Cartel Office
- Andreas Mundt
- Illegal Agreements
As for the details of this price collusion case between Sennheiser and the Federal Cartel Office (as of May 7, 2025), there's a dearth of specifics available. Nevertheless, a summary from MLex suggests that both Sennheiser and Sonova, as audio equipment makers, have received fines for colluding on retail prices[1]. However, the exact amounts of the fines, the affected products, and the duration of the illicit agreements are not disclosed in the accessible sources.
Insights:
- Both Sennheiser and Sonova, audio equipment manufacturers, have been fined for colluding on retail prices by the German Federal Cartel Office (implied).
- The exact amounts of the fines, the products involved, and the duration of the illegal agreements remain undisclosed.
- Further specifics — such as the exact fines, specific product lines, and the period of the illegal agreements — are not available in the provided results. More extensive official sources or detailed news coverage would be necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the situation[1].
- The ECSC Treaty, which created the European Coal and Steel Community, played a pivotal role in laying the groundwork for the EU, as it marked the first time European nations forged a shared economic policy, including antitrust laws to prevent cartels like the one uncovered in the Sennheiser and Sonova price-fixing case.
- Despite the training in cartel law, employees of Sennheiser and Sonova allegedly colluded on prices, violating business ethics and European competition laws outlined in the ECSC Treaty.
- The fines handed down by the German Federal Cartel Office to Sennheiser and Sonova serve as a reminder of the importance of upholding free market principles and adhering to the antitrust regulations established in the ECSC Treaty and subsequent EU treaties.
- In 2022, the audio equipment industry, particularly the high-end headphones market, found itself under scrutiny for price manipulation, echoing the concerns addressed in the ECSC Treaty, which aimed to prevent monopolies and maintain fair competition within European industries.
