Skip to content

Controversy over a 300 million ruble contract as the Prosecutor's Office intervenes

Khabarovsk Region's Prosecutor's Office Contests Contract Worth 300 Million Rubles - Reported on 06.06.2025 - Covered by 'Khabarovsk Krai Today' (Paraphrased News Item).

Khabarovsk Krai Prosecutor's Office Disputes a 300 Million Ruble Contract Scheduled for June 2025 -...
Khabarovsk Krai Prosecutor's Office Disputes a 300 Million Ruble Contract Scheduled for June 2025 - Recent Developments in Incidents by Khabarovsk Krai Today

Controversy over a 300 million ruble contract as the Prosecutor's Office intervenes

In the Khabarovsk region, the local authorities have launched a legal crusade against an illicit contract worth a whopping 300 million rubles for the provision and installation of a modular pool. This allegedly rigged deal was inked with a single supplier, as unveiled by the "Khabarovsk Krai Today" news agency.

The regional office sprang into action, initiating a competitive bidding process. Despite a cheaper offer by a different contender of 16.5 million rubles, the initial bid winner clinched the victory. After scrutiny of a complaint lodged by the disgruntled cheaper bidder, the Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service for the Khabarovsk Krai concluded that the competition was rigged and nullified the outcomes. The institution was compelled to rectify its errors and arrange another competition.

In a shocking turn of events, a new competition transpired within mere days, culminating in a contract with the same winner. However, it seems the director had prior knowledge of the lower bid. While the intricacies of the subsequent investigation and its aftermath remain elusive, it's essential to note that the competitive bidding process in such instances aims to promote fair business practices and prevent monopolies.

In the subsequent investigation, the Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service will likely focus on maintaining fair competition in the industry, particularly in relation to the finance sector and business deals. The repeated success of a single supplier in such questionable circumstances raises concerns about the transparency within the region's public procurement process.

Read also:

    Latest