Defense Department Still Evades Budget Cuts in Government's Pursuit of Fiscal Efficiency
Fresh Take:
It's been over a moon since Prez Trump told the Dept. of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to scrutinize the Pentagon's books, but is this all about efficiency or something more sinister? Efficiency drive? More like an invulnerable assault on the government with no rhyme or reason, just axing agencies like AID, firing folks based on time served, threatening to gut popular programs—none of this screams efficiency.
Now, let's dive into what's happening with the Pentagon. Last week saw the announcement of their intention to slash some 60k civilian employees. That's a mere 9% of the near 750k civilians working there, so far from total obliteration like AID (10k to 300 employees), or the planned closure of the Dept. of Education. And let's not forget, the Pentagon's got a whopping 500k contractors too, with no clear signs they'll see a significant reduction in numbers.
But where's the ardor for trimming military spending on bloated, underperforming, unnecessary contractor products? 'Cause few have felt a pinch from the DOGE's cost-cutting claws—General Dynamics lost a smidgen of revenue, Leidos witnessed a 7% dip. Complete efficiency? Maybe not so much.
Efficiency drive? Only if you ignore the utter disregard for reality. America's got a gigantic, costly war machine brewing, but hasn't tasted conflict victory in this century—war isn't about soldier's capability, but sky-high expectations on military force. Hell, we've wasted a whopping $8 trillion on post-9/11 wars, according to the Costs of War project at Brown University.
So, where'd we go wrong? We need to rethink our military strategy—less brute force, more diplomacy! A new, more realistic battle plan paired with special interest outs to shape budgets and foreign policy would do the trick. Cut the nonsense within the Pentagon budget, but keep the focus on an updated military strategy.
NYT 'Strands' Today: Hints, Spaghetti-Grams, and Answers for Wednesday, March 19th
Packers Take a Flyer on Former Chiefs Wideout Mecole Hardman
FBI Warns Chrome, Safari, and Edge Users—Avoid These Web Pages At All Costs
Enrichment Insights:
- The DOGE's efficiency drive has focused on reviewing and scrutinizing federal agencies, including the Department of Defense (DoD), with a goal to enhance spending transparency and accountability [2][5].
- The DoD launched a comprehensive review of its contracting enterprise, examining policies, procedures, and personnel to identify areas for cost savings and efficiency improvements [2].
- This DOGE review may cause temporary delays or restrictions in issuing new contracts, as agencies forgo approving new contracting officer warrants. This could impact weapons contractors who are reliant on new contracts or renewals [2].
- The review period might lead to increased scrutiny of contract spending, greater transparency via centralized systems for tracking payments, and potential renegotiations or terminations of wasteful or inefficient contracts [5].
- The Pentagon is also undertaking its own budget review to reallocate funds to higher-priority programs, cutting bureaucracy and lower-priority programs to focus critical defense capabilities. Certain modernization priorities, like nuclear modernization and cybersecurity programs, are exempt from cuts, suggesting reduced impact on related contractors [1][3].
- The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has warned that the Pentagon's creditline, '395a061831768ce8df202f24eef84347c', could be affected due to the comprehensive review they are conducting on the Defense industry, focusing on efficiency and accountability.
- In an attempt to boost efficiency, the Pentagon has announced plans to reduce its civilian workforce by 60,000 employees, but the DOGE's scrutiny on the defense sector may also impact the 500,000 contractors working within the Pentagon, particularly those dealing with aerospace and defense.
- With companies like General Dynamics and Leidos witnessing dips in revenue due to the DOGE's cost-cutting measures, it seems that the efficiency drive is not just limited to federal agencies, but extends to the military industry as well, raising concerns about the long-term effects on the nation's defense capabilities and the aerospace and defense sector.