Skip to content

Subsidiary of General Motors abandons application for Independent Labor Union recognition

A regulatory decision, occurring a day into the business week, sees the FDIC granting an ILC charter after a four-year hiatus. GM received conditional approbation for its application from a Utah banking authority on June 14.

A general Motors affiliated entity retracts its request for an Industrial and Labor Council charter
A general Motors affiliated entity retracts its request for an Industrial and Labor Council charter

Subsidiary of General Motors abandons application for Independent Labor Union recognition

In a significant development, GM Financial, the financial arm of the automotive giant General Motors, has withdrawn its application for an Industrial Loan Company (ILC) charter from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The decision was announced on Monday, following conditional approval from the Utah Department of Financial Institutions.

The ILC charter format, which grants firms a banking license subject to state rather than full federal regulation, has been a topic of much debate. Trade groups and lawmakers have raised concerns about the charter, citing potential risks and loopholes that could lead to regulatory arbitrage, conflicts of interest, and threats to consumer privacy.

The regulatory structure of ILCs allows them to hold banking assets without the same level of federal oversight and restrictions as traditional banks, raising fears they might engage in riskier or less transparent financial activities. Moreover, because ILCs can be owned by industrial or commercial firms, there is a worry about mixing banking and commerce, potentially leading to increased systemic risk.

Some groups argue that ILCs may not have the same consumer safeguards, increasing vulnerabilities to financial instability or unfair lending practices. These concerns have led to heightened scrutiny and hesitation from both regulators and applicants, including investment company Edward Jones and e-commerce giant Rakuten, who have also withdrawn their ILC charter applications.

Romero Rainey, CEO of the Independent Community Bankers of America, highlighted potential issues, including conflicts of interest, risks to the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund, and threats to consumer privacy stemming from the commercial activities of ILC applicants.

The withdrawal of GM Financial's application aligns with ongoing debates over the ILC charter’s suitability in modern financial regulation. If approved, GM Financial's ILC would have marked a return to the ILC format for the company, whose previous lending arm, GMAC, had held an ILC charter until 2008. The ILC charter would have allowed GM Financial to accept deposits and provide a low-cost capital base to grow its business.

The FDIC approved its first ILC charter in four years to Thrivent Financial for Lutherans on the day before GM Financial's withdrawal, raising questions about the future of ILC applications. Utah, home to 15 industrial banks, generates 6,000 jobs and $700 million in state GDP every year, according to senators.

The controversy surrounding the ILC charter format is not new. A group of senators led by Mitt Romney, R-UT, urged the FDIC to consider the pending ILC applications in March, expressing concerns about the potential disruptions they pose to the financial regulatory framework.

As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the FDIC will address these concerns and whether other applicants will follow GM Financial's lead in withdrawing their ILC charter applications.

  1. Although GM Financial has withdrawn its ILC charter application, concerns about the potential risks and loopholes associated with the charter format persist in the finance industry, as highlighted by Romero Rainey, CEO of the Independent Community Bankers of America.
  2. The controversy surrounding ILCs and their potential impact on consumer privacy, regulatory arbitrage, and systemic risk in the business world has led to increased hesitation among applicants, with GM Financial, Edward Jones, and Rakuten all choosing to withdraw their ILC charter applications, creating uncertainty about the future of this format in modern financial regulation.

Read also:

    Latest