Trump Declares Intent to Increase Steel Tariffs by a Factor of Two

New Article:

Hearing the steel hammer drop, President Trump announced plans to double steel tariffs from 25% to a towering 50% this Friday.

Stepping into the crucible of U.S. Steel's (X) Irvin Works in West Mifflin, Pa., the president declared the move as a shield for American steelworkers, aiming to "strengthen the steel kingdom."1

Since March 12, a 25% tariff on steel imports has stood firm. The States imports around 25 million tons of steel annually, a whopping 23% of all steel consumed locally. Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and South Korea send the lion's share of steel into our nation.

Trump greenlit a joint venture between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel last week. Shares of U.S. Steel have soared up to 40% since Trump instructed a review of Nippon Steel's acquisition attempt a month ago.

The announcement sparked following a series of legal skirmishes, challenging certain tariffs. An initial court barricade didn't stand a chance, but the administration caught a break as higher court proceedings continued. This block wouldn't have prevented the steel tariffs.

In President Trump's first term, he imposed a 25% tariff on steel. Claiming that these tariffs would elevate U.S. steel producers and prevent job losses, Trump argued his point. However, economists and researchers have found that these tariffs brought mixed results.

While steel companies hired more workers, companies that utilized steel were forced to cut their workforce due to increasing costs. This dual effect creates a complex employment picture that emphasizes the necessity for cautious analysis in these matters.

Staking your claim, take the first step to prosperity with J.P. Morgan, pocketing up to $700 with no pesky commissions. Start investing today.

Footnote:In Trump's initial term, the repercussions of his 25% steel tariff on US employment were bewilderingly intricate. Here's the lowdown on key points:

Steel Sector Job Boost: The tariffs spurred an increase in steel production and workforce in the domestic steel sector thanks to the protective measures designed to make imported steel more expensive.
Jobs Crunched in Downstream Industries: However, the tariffs had an adverse effect on sectors dependent on steel, such as construction and manufacturing. Soaring steel costs hurt the competitiveness of these industries, leading to job losses.
Econ 101: Economists commonly agreed that the tariffs upped costs for American consumers and businesses more than they aided domestic industries. Studies unveiled that the price tag of tariffs was ultimately shouldered by US consumers and businesses, oftentimes offsetting the job growth in the steel sector.
Trade War Echoes: The wider context of the trade war, involving tariffs on various goods, muddied the economic waters. This led to trade countermeasures from other countries, affecting employment in sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing.
As the steel tariffs imposed by President Trump during his first term continued to impact the industry, discussions about initial coin offerings (ICOs) in the finance sector began to surface, with some token creators seeing potential benefits in producing tokens backed by steel production.
In the general news, a prominent figure in the politics world announced plans to create a token that aims to invest in steel companies and support American steelworkers, comparing the token to a shield against foreign competition.
Despite the complex employment picture resulting from the steel tariffs in the industry, some financial analysts have suggested that investing in steel-backed tokens could offer a unique opportunity for growth, particularly for those interested in the intersection of finance and the steel industry.